Pinker is right that we should formulate our ideas based on evidence, not bias and preconceptions.
He compares design in evolution to human creativity, and concedes that his ideas about ID may not be consistent with traditional theism.
Whether the context is Wikipedia or the academic scene on the Iberian Peninsula, the scientific “consensus” on ID is maintained by shutting down debate and silencing scholarship.
Here’s what’s new about the iconic molecular machine that launched Michael Behe’s design revolution.
We last checked in with Robert Lawrence Kuhn as he interviewed Nobel laureate Brian Josephson who said he was “80 percent” sure of intelligent design.