It seems that a movement of support for academic freedom is rising in Australia. I hope it makes its way to the United States.
Wow! That is some stirring prose. The reference to Darwin is ironic, though.
Does the “scientific consensus” mean that only scientists who follow the majority are entitled to have their say?
Remember Peter Ridd, the scientist who studied the Great Barrier Reef and spoke out against those who said it showed evidence of global warming?
This is a familiar type of story to anyone who follows the news about academic freedom, especially on the subject of evolution.