Barring startling new revelations from the research community, nothing more needs to be said. The evidence comes down decisively on Behe’s side.
Many studies show that degradative mutations in APOB cause decreased cholesterol.
The core difficulty for some scientists who read Michael Behe’s book is also the key idea at its heart.
The criticisms keep coming. It’s hard to keep up. Lents, in fact, just yesterday added additional commentary on Behe’s use of the chart.
The discrepancy in method is crucial to understanding this argument against Behe. Yet curiously, it is omitted from mention by Lents and Hunt. Why?