Tag: Response to Criticism
On the Barnes & Noble Shelving Fiasco, Readers Offer Further Insight, Amusement
It seems the decision to put Meyer in the Christianity section and Dawkins’s God Delusion under Science was not made locally.
A Reader Shares a Telling Experience About Shopping at Barnes & Noble for Darwin’s Doubt
This is self-sabotage by someone at B&N who doesn’t like intelligent design.
Among Theistic Evolutionists, Still No Consensus on What’s Wrong with Stephen Meyer’s Argument
The notion that mutation and selection really aren’t blind and undirected is a faith-statement for which they can provide no supporting evidence.
Low Oxygen Suffocates Darwinian Explanations for the Cambrian Explosion
Well over a year since Darwin’s Doubt was published, Darwinists still can’t seem to find any better explanation for the Cambrian explosion than oxygen levels.
Alister McGrath Mistakes Intelligent Design for a God-of-the-Gaps Argument
I’m a fan of much of McGrath’s writings, but when it comes to ID, there are problems.