There is some evidence that once again, the diapason of opinion is being changed. The claims of intelligent design are too insistent and too plausible to be frivolously dismissed.
Interested in a resolution of the dispute between scientific atheists and intelligent design?
The father had sent his son a copy of our book, urging him to read it so the two could discuss the evidence and arguments there.
There is an ongoing debate about intelligent design in the Thomist system.
Following Darwin, with an assist from Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Lewontin, Ken Miller proposes that human reason, consciousness, etc. are exaptations, or “spandrels.”