I grasp the argument Professor Brian Keating is making in his PragerU video.
Joseph Le Conte stated what will become clear to anyone who tries to present evidence to Darwinists.
What is it that we are most sure of? It’s a fundamental question, the object of philosophical analysis for millennia.
May I add a further observation? If you don’t mind, ID is not an “apologetic tool,” as BioLogos puts it.
I was alarmed to see physicist Sabine Hossenfelder accept as a definition of ”science,” not a method, but merely “what scientists do.”