Author: Stephen C. Meyer
Denying the Signature: Was My Argument Subjective?
Bishop and O’Connor claim there is no objective, scientific basis for privileging, or focusing on, “life” in my analysis.
Denying the Signature: Functional Information Is the Fact to Be Explained
Philosophers of science analyzing scientific arguments make a clear distinction between what needs to be explained and the competing explanations.
Denying the Signature: A Response to Bishop and O’Connor
Philosophers Robert Bishop and Robert O’Connor offer a cleverly titled joint review of Darwin’s Doubt and Signature in the Cell.
What Should Politicians Say When Asked About Evolution?
Scott Walker is not the only Republican hopeful to have stumbled on this question.
Walking It Back? Further Reflections on the Response to Darwin’s Doubt from BioLogos
President Deborah Haarsma suggests that I mischaracterized the perspective of the organization’s reviewers in my response to them.