Bishop and O’Connor claim there is no objective, scientific basis for privileging, or focusing on, “life” in my analysis.
Philosophers of science analyzing scientific arguments make a clear distinction between what needs to be explained and the competing explanations.
Philosophers Robert Bishop and Robert O’Connor offer a cleverly titled joint review of Darwin’s Doubt and Signature in the Cell.
Scott Walker is not the only Republican hopeful to have stumbled on this question.
President Deborah Haarsma suggests that I mischaracterized the perspective of the organization’s reviewers in my response to them.