Category: Human Origins
How do Theistic Evolutionists Explain the Fossil Record and Human Origins?
In six recent articles, I have argued that the fossil record does not support the evolution of ape-like species into human-like species.
What a Darwin Advocate’s Response to the ENCODE Project Tells Us about the Darwin Debate
The consensus of molecular biologists — people who actually study how the genome works — now believe that the idea of “junk DNA” is essentially wrong.
McBride Misstates My Arguments in Science and Human Origins
Paul McBride claims that I am arguing there is some kind of a “conspiracy” where paleoanthropologists willfully conspire to hide the truth from the public.
Read Your References Carefully: Paul McBride’s Prized Citation on Skull-Sizes Supports My Thesis, Not His
There’s a reason why McBride focuses his response so heavily on skull sizes — it’s a rare characteristic for which there’s some consistent kind of a trajectory over time.
Double Standards and a Single Variable: A Response to Paul McBride’s Review of Fossils in Science and Human Origins
McBride provided the pro-evolution blogosphere with something to talk about, and his review has since been hailed on a number of evolution blogs.