It can detect a single photon. It can test the foundations of our understanding of nature. And it is also a piece of “botched” work by evolution?
Compromises are driven by the limitations of a material world, but also by the vision that lies behind the design.
The problem is, none of these people cite papers or other writing by researchers on intelligent design, like the work done by Douglas Axe on protein evolution probabilities.
Or in a rock? Or a snowflake? This is a common contention from ID critics.
The news from NASA today, undeniably of some mild interest, is being overblown.