C. John Collins points out that Venema’s use of “language evolution” is a poor analogy for (his form of) biological evolution.
His choice of targets for criticism and for praise have a lot more to do with his particular agenda than the defects or merits of those whom he critiques.
Richard Buggs gives us a look inside the sausage factory where figures on the subject are calculated.
Dennis Venema sought to persuade his fellow Christians that genetic science had disproven the traditional idea of a “bottleneck” of two human ancestors.
In a previous article I described how scientific training can condition some scientists’ minds to resist the evidence in nature for intelligent design.