The discrepancy in method is crucial to understanding this argument against Behe. Yet curiously, it is omitted from mention by Lents and Hunt. Why?
Michael Behe correctly interpreted a paper by Liu et al. and followed its methodology, whereas his critics, Lents and Hunt, did not.
He doesn’t mean there won’t be humans in the Oval Office in the future, but that the power behind the power will be AI. Is it true?
The standard evolutionary model is incapable of driving major transformations such as a fish evolving into an amphibian.
“It is the obscurity of AI that most impairs liberty. We do not know what is being done to us or even what is being done by us.”