“It looked like a fern. But as a budding geologist, [UK teenager Tina] Negus knew these 600 million year old rocks were too old to host such a plant.”
The deniers of the well-established scientific consensus rest their argument on the recent publications of a few maverick paleontologists.
The theory has been made immune to empirical falsification because it is simply assumed to be true by default as the only viable option for materialists.
Eric Cassell asks, “How did these complex programmed behaviors originate?” The question deserves a better answer than, “They evolved.”
The fossil record shows a “Hexapod Gap.” Unfortunately for Darwin, the two leading theories to explain the gap can be ruled out.