There’s a gaping God-shaped hole in both Krauss and Peterson’s particular ways of spinning all this.
How do modularity, specificity, adaptability, durability, and other aspects of engineering systems argue for design in nature?
The Darwinian view encourages a way of interacting with others where the aim is to “humiliate [one’s] lesser brethren, just to remind them who’s boss.”
As to evidence for intelligent design, my impression has long been that the ancients gave more weight to the stars than to their own bodies.
Darwinian materialism suggests that the impulse toward artistic creation is merely the human songbird attracting a mate.