Could sex be the product of a gradual evolutionary process, one dictated by “numerous, successive, slight, modifications,” as Darwin himself put it?
The cherished evolutionary story of whales’ “vestigial” pelvic bones joins the growing pile of discredited icons of evolution.
For all practical purposes, there seems to be little daylight today between methodological and metaphysical naturalism, at least in graduate science classes.
William Dembski explains in an excellent new podcast interview with Christopher Sernaque.
Intelligent design theorists have long argued against the idea that non-protein coding DNA is useless evolutionary junk.