Darwinists have always hidden behind the complexities of biological systems. As always, they assume no burden of proof.
Intelligent design pioneer Michael Behe continues his conversation with philosophers Pat Flynn and Jim Madden.
What are some new examples of irreducibly complex systems? What are some objections to ID from well-known critics?
After following the discussion about evolution versus design for the past few decades, I have noticed a common trend.
Statements in news articles suggest that some science writers, while aware of ID, don’t understand what is required for a Darwinian response.