Well, not exactly, but what he says here comes awfully close to hitting just that mark.
If the past is any guide, where the critics are substantive rather than snarky or patronizing, we’re in for a good debate.
The dual wave and particulate aspects of light, essential to our ability to see, and so much else, must all be just right to within insanely precise parameters.
A evolutionist complains, “They try to use ‘Darwinist’ like an albatross linking evolution to Darwin’s Victorian white supremacy.”
Yesterday on Twitter we had the opportunity to recommend it to an ID critic who wrote a book chapter on intelligent design without first doing his homework.