Evolution is good at creating niche advantages by breaking things; it isn’t good at building fundamentally novel forms.
Michigan State University biologist Richard Lenski and collaborators have just published a terrific new paper.
Darwinists easily obtain a global microphone to rant against intelligent design, while ID advocates silently gain adherents. Is it a sign of desperation?
How can Tibetans survive high altitudes that leave lowlanders gasping? The answer is found in broken genes.
Mainstream evolutionary biologists are independently arriving at very similar conclusions to Behe’s central thesis.