I would argue that a chronology of exactly what was predicted when is not dispositive as to whether a positive argument can be made.
Irreducible complexity and high CSI systems are found, indicating these systems were designed.
In short, the sequences performed no new function, so no new information was created.
Lockdowns were imposed on society in the name of science, although the actual scientific basis of many of the measures employed was unclear at best.
How does information theory challenge Darwinian evolution? And how can the methods of probability be used to assess key evolutionary claims?