Though Judge Jones’s findings were false when he made them in 2005, many have used his ruling as an excuse to perpetuate these false criticisms of ID.
About half the contributors are names that ENV readers will know well.
The lab got off to a rough start in 2007 when Baylor administrators learned that Robert Marks was doing ID-friendly research on the campus.
When religion comes up in the evolution debate it is almost always an atheist or a theistic evolutionist who raises the subject.
What do you give to an exhausted relic of antique 19th-century scientific materialism that has everything but genuine credibility?