He offers as an illustration the widespread skepticism in the physics community toward the possibility of anyone ever building a perpetual motion machine.
Kevin Williamson deploys an absurd reductionist construct of the ID field as consisting of ideological assertions by “lawyers” and “amateurs.”
A biologist in our network worked as a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard. He recounted how about a quarter of the postdocs he encountered were at least sympathetic to design arguments.
“TE thus represents a very deep sink or depression in the landscape of theological and scientific opinion.”
A chemist-turned-philosopher, J.P. Moreland approaches the intersection of science and worldviews with a love and respect for both.