How evidence is interpreted is wrenched into line with the ideology. And this is what we mean by “zombie science.”
Here’s an article from the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution with an eye-catching title.
With his own sly humor, Dr. Wells points out some scientific problems with regarding Darwin’s Tree as unassailable fact.
Where do you turn for a reliable, responsible resource to help you clarify the issues for your students?
Given evolutionary presuppositions, the direction of research and learning is not from lesser to greater clarity, but just the opposite.
Three massive acts of exquisitely complex re-engineering would be required, far beyond the reach of unguided natural processes.
There are a few problems with conventional accounts of whale evolution. Together they’re a killer.
Isn’t DNA the one and only “secret of life”? Neo-Darwinism, a gene-obsessed doctrine, needs it to be.
We don’t mean to slight other big countries or important parts of the world where ID is on the rise.
In his new book, Jonathan Wells asks a simple question: If the icons of evolution were just innocent textbook errors, why do so many of them still persist?