I won’t recap the splendid work Emily Reeves has already done here in dissecting the TEDx talk from a scientific angle.
We may dispute what Darwin felt or thought in the privacy of his study — but the bulk of his writings fall clearly into advocating for one perspective: naturalism.
She was called into a meeting and chastised by faculty members. She recorded the meeting and publicized the recording.
The rank-and-file are increasingly interested in charismatic, sharp-witted, unpredictable, even quite humane and tolerant figures like Jordan Peterson.
This, from a critic seeking to dissuade viewers from the intelligent design position, is the carefully selected metaphor for casting ID as emotionally cold and remote?