Tag: Laurence Moran
“Creation Myths” Misquotes and Misrepresents Junk DNA Video
Our video backs up what it says with clear quotes and references. We’ve provided more documentation here.
New Long Story Video Tackles “A Battle of Predictions: Junk DNA”
Something happened in 2012 that changed the entire debate in favor of the ID-based prediction that DNA would be largely functional.
A Reckoning for Darwinism as “Junk DNA” Flops
As a product of care and intention, the genome ought to be comparable in a way with products of human genius, with every detail there for a reason.
With One Short Rule, Philip Ball Explains Why “Junk DNA” May Be a Placeholder for Ignorance
Here is Ball’s proposed rule for molecular biologists: “stop assuming,” he writes, “we know which parts of DNA matter and which don’t.”
Moran: Sternberg and Behe “Appear to Know More About Evolution than Their Opponents”
The whole point of selection was to bias or direct the deliverances of chance variation, so that “luck” didn’t have to do all the work.