The perpetuation of Darwinian ideology comes at the cost of truly grappling with the profound nature of the question of biological origins.
My first exposure to intelligent design detection in science took place during a summer job with National Defence Research in 1978 as an engineering student.
At a conference, says Miller, “I removed two parts from a mousetrap (leaving just the base, spring, and hammer), and used that 3-part device as a functional tie-clip.”
If cichlid evolution is a central paradigm in evolutionary biology, then Darwinism’s sphere of explanatory inference is too small to matter.
After Oparin’s coacervate theory was presented in the 1920s, it was dismissed as unworkable. Now, coacervates are back in style.