Tag: Michael Behe
Intelligent Design, Common Descent, and an Ascent of Mount Everest
Did four-year-old Angela climb Everest by herself? No way.
Intelligent Design and Common Descent
A reader asks, “I was just wondering why some fellows at Discovery believe in ID but still hold to common descent.“
The Nobel Prize and Intelligent Evolution
The contrast between the evolutionary sterility of Lenski’s unintelligent Darwinian evolution and the evolutionary potency of Arnold, Smith, and Winter’s intelligent evolution is striking.
Behe’s Irreducible Complexity Validated by Chemistry Nobel
Darwinist Jerry Coyne misunderstands design science. Intelligent design is two scientific inferences.
How the 2018 Nobel Laureates in Chemistry Harnessed Intelligent Design
There is one point of confusion in descriptions of this year’s prize winners. It’s the talk of “directed evolution.”