Richard Dawkins predicted that “a large fraction” of our genomes has no function, because, “The true ‘purpose’ of DNA is to survive, no more and no less.”
Before Darwin, biologists attributed the beauty, integrated complexity, and adaptation of organisms to their environments to a powerful designing intelligence.
The study was able to directly measure mutations after they occurred in the plant but before mutations could have been affected by natural selection.
Fom the standpoint of empirical science, continued claims that the evidence for evolution is “incontrovertible” might be better termed one long bluff.
To those who say ID advocates are only critical of Darwinism because they are not sufficiently versed in genetics, I have a two-word reply.