It’s fine to search through random results for an outcome you’re aiming for. Just don’t call it Darwinian evolution.
Wallace’s formulation of evolution was quite incompatible with Darwin’s. His theory might be called intelligent evolution.
As I asked in a previous post: Why is Alfred Russel Wallace today a comparatively little known figure next to Darwin?
With his own sly humor, Dr. Wells points out some scientific problems with regarding Darwin’s Tree as unassailable fact.
There are a few problems with conventional accounts of whale evolution. Together they’re a killer.