Hear about a time when a cherished American institution warmly endorsed Darwinian-inspired efforts to breed a master race.
Evolution, the New York Times lectured, is “No more debatable than the multiplication table.” Sound familiar?
You will be astonished by how corrupt science can become when reviewers are “very, very vigilant” to protect consensus science.
University of Warwick sociologist Steve Fuller is one of the few researchers in his field who knows much about intelligent design and the controversy it ignites.
Darwin-inspired eugenics and racial pseudoscience are like some sort of insidious, and hideous, household pest.