Even Darwin would be aghast at what the world has made of a mere abstract that he was almost pathologically ambivalent about ever publishing.
How did Charles Darwin react to Wallace’s argument for design? Historian Michael Flannery joins Tom Woodward to explain.
We hear a lot of talk these days about “following the science.” But science rarely speaks with one unified voice.
As I asked in a previous post: Why is Alfred Russel Wallace today a comparatively little known figure next to Darwin?