I’ll close with a story. My wife used to set up psychiatric units across the U.S.
If you deny that probabilities apply to a physical process, you’ve abjured science — you no longer have a scientific theory.
Since the flagellum gets so overused in the debate between ID and Darwinism, let’s change the system. Consider the leaf hopper.
Take a simple example, one that Rosenhouse finds deeply convincing and emblematic for biological evolution.
Rosenhouse’s book is objectively bad. It purports to be a critique of mathematics as used by ID proponents and of my mathematical work in particular.