He covers how “a lightbulb went on” for him about Darwinism, the fatal waiting time problem, why the ballyhooed extended synthesis fails to save the day for evolution, and more.
Harari’s assurance about building group cohesion is simplistic and woefully insufficient to account for common characteristics of religion.
So how did the paper determine that photosynthesis has an “overall simplicity,” despite the complexity just described?
That there is a design to life is intuitive, but most of us, if challenged on it, would want to be able to defend our intuition persuasively.
Mathematics has been at the foundation of modern challenges to neo-Darwinism, while those challenges are met mostly with handwaving.