Intelligent Design Icon Intelligent Design
Life Sciences Icon Life Sciences

Why Intelligent Design Can Help Develop Clean, Green Energy Solutions

Emily Reeves
Photo credit: Seagul, via Pixabay.

If nature is designed and not the product of unguided random processes, then it may exhibit optimal green energy solutions to ecosystem constraints. As I’ll suggest in this and two follow-up posts, such solutions can and should inform modern energy designs.

Nature, specifically, photosynthesis, has been criticized as being inefficient. Why? Because it is assumed to be the product of a mindless evolutionary process:

Plants are less efficient at capturing the energy in sunlight than solar cells mostly because they have too much evolutionary baggage.

MSU Today

The comparatively low efficiency of natural photosynthesis may result partly from the “legacy biochemistry” photosynthetic organisms inherited from earlier non-photosynthetic organisms that used biochemical pathways with redox cofactors not optimally matched for photochemical processes.

Blankenship et al. 2011

But perhaps these statements are short-sighted, failing to recognize that efficiency might be a tradeoff for sustainability and the health of the ecosystem as a whole.

While nature’s organic materials do not outperform their inorganic semiconductor counterparts in terms of solar capture, plants still hold the upper hand in regard to CO2 fixation. (Cestellos-Blanco et al. 2020) While photosynthesis is not as efficient as certain photovoltaics, photovoltaics are also not simultaneously fixing carbon and splitting H2O into oxygen — two critical chemical reactions for ecosystem balance. Furthermore, photovoltaics are also not biodegradable and self-replicating. Therefore, as the world seeks to better understand ecosystem parameters and balance, it’s time to revisit the intelligent design detectable in nature as a starting point. (Cestellos-Blanco et al. 2020)

Mining Energy

When it comes to energy, biology and engineers have to solve the same problem. Energy must be mined and directed, in order to do work and create order. Both face a set of common constraints within which their designs must operate (i.e., gravity, entropy, friction, and the nuclear force). While both have energy-mining solutions for doing useful work, the mechanisms of nature seem to account for ecosystem-level constraints, while the solutions of engineers have met energy needs by accounting for ecosystem balance. This has been overlooked until recently. Partly to blame might be a lack of crosstalk between biology and engineering in addition to viewing nature’s energy maintenance and balance as the result of a mindless process instead of intelligent design.

Achieving sustainable energy requires, first of all, understanding where energy comes from. I’ll turn to that subject tomorrow.

Emily Reeves

Emily Reeves is a biochemist, metabolic nutritionist, and aspiring systems biologist. Her doctoral studies were completed at Texas A&M University in Biochemistry and Biophysics. Emily is currently an active clinician for metabolic nutrition and nutritional genomics at Nutriplexity. She enjoys identifying and designing nutritional intervention for subtle inborn errors of metabolism. She is also working with fellows of Discovery Institute and the greater scientific community to promote integration of engineering and biology. She spends her weekends adventuring with her husband, brewing kombucha, and running near Puget Sound.



CO2 fixationconstraintsecosystemEnergyentropyevolutionfrictiongravitygreen energyintelligent designnuclear forceoxygenphotosynthesisphotovoltaicssunlightsustainable energy