Tag: Colleagues’ Responses
A Listener’s Guide to the Meyer-Marshall Radio Debate: Focus on the Origin of Information Question
With respect to the critical question of the origin of the information necessary to build new forms of animal life, a strictly materialistic evolutionary approach has little left to offer.
In Radio Debate, Darwin’s Doubt Critic Charles Marshall Acknowledges Meyer’s Fossil Treatment Is “Good Scholarship”
It was an excellent debate, with both participants offering important insights and good arguments, though in my opinion Meyer unquestionably had the better of it.
When Meyer Met Marshall (for a Radio Debate)
Stephen Meyer recently debated UC Berkeley paleontologist Charles Marshall on the Cambrian explosion and Dr. Meyer’s book Darwin’s Doubt.
Rules for Discounting Scientific Pretensions
There are at least twenty reasons politicians should be wary of scientific claims, three scientists explain in Nature.
Unintended Consequences: How Hostile Responses to Darwin’s Doubt Turned a Thoughtful Reader Against Darwinian Evolution
A bumper sticker I’ve seen around in Seattle protests the War on Terror, warning that “We’re making enemies faster than we can kill them…”