“Evolution” in its deepest sense is a foundational metaphysical commitment, not a scientific theory that one could test.
The paper could cause a stir, since it has violated an “implicit agreement” that mainstream academics should never criticize public advocates of evolution.
I grasp the argument Professor Brian Keating is making in his PragerU video.
I was alarmed to see physicist Sabine Hossenfelder accept as a definition of ”science,” not a method, but merely “what scientists do.”
“Science is a game with one defining rule,” writes UCLA biochemist Richard E. Dickerson.