Tag: Joshua Swamidass
Critic of Intelligent Design Acknowledges: “Bad Design” Arguments Don’t Work
It’s good to be able to report progress.
Nathan Lents Is Back; Still Wrong About Sinuses
The interaction with Lents is of interest because it provides an opportunity to look again, in some detail, at a fascinating illustration of design in action.
Answering Swamidass on Theistic Evolution: Sketchy Science, and a Swerve into Metaphysics
His choice of targets for criticism and for praise have a lot more to do with his particular agenda than the defects or merits of those whom he critiques.
Swamidass: Cancer “Can Innovate”
Cancer proves evolution only insofar as one forgets, or pretends not to know, what evolution is supposed to explain.
Answering Joshua Swamidass: What Do Theistic Evolutionists Believe?
There are innumerable descriptions and definitions of theistic evolution. How things are phrased matters a lot.