The perpetuation of Darwinian ideology comes at the cost of truly grappling with the profound nature of the question of biological origins.
Backed up by no fewer than four security guards, three conference officials hustled him out, accusing him of promoting fake science.
It’s fine to search through random results for an outcome you’re aiming for. Just don’t call it Darwinian evolution.
Wallace’s formulation of evolution was quite incompatible with Darwin’s. His theory might be called intelligent evolution.
As I asked in a previous post: Why is Alfred Russel Wallace today a comparatively little known figure next to Darwin?