Dr. Behe has had a lot of challenges posed to him over the years, both those that are seemingly substantive and others of a more, shall we say, rhetorical nature.
Surely the “iconic” status of Darwin’s book could never have been predicted by either the author or his publisher.
Johnson spotted the slick tactics in evolutionary arguments, “the same rhetorical tricks that clever lawyers use when they have to defend a flawed case in court.”
The paper could cause a stir, since it has violated an “implicit agreement” that mainstream academics should never criticize public advocates of evolution.
I grasp the argument Professor Brian Keating is making in his PragerU video.