I am intrigued, but to be honest, I don’t quite know what to make of it just yet, and don’t want to jump to any conclusions.
We talk about the “evolution” of automobiles, yet we know there was design at every stage of this evolution.
In my book, I argue that Thomas Aquinas’ teaching cannot be reconciled with theistic evolution.
Why are evolutionists always wrong? And why are they always so sure of themselves?
In a seemingly infinite hall of mirrors, monumental assertions are casually made and immediately followed by citations that simply do the same thing.