What’s the pivot that turns us toward more traditional solutions, versus the wrongly named “progressive” ones?
The origin and nature of man should be important to any thoughtful human being, of any religion or none.
A evolutionist complains, “They try to use ‘Darwinist’ like an albatross linking evolution to Darwin’s Victorian white supremacy.”
This was supposed to be of scientific interest, educating visitors in the evolutionary doctrine that placed Africans in close relationship to apes.
As for criticism that ID is a “God of the Gaps” argument, Michael Chaberek urges Thomists to consider where that complaint leads.