Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • andrew-mcdiarmid-headshotAndrew McDiarmid
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • egnorMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • aldrichRachel Adams
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • en-orange-boxEvolution News
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 02.20.19
  • |
  • Search

Archives

Evolution IconEvolution
Michael Behe
February 14, 2019, 8:27 PM

Train Wreck of a Review: A Response to Lenski et al. in Science

Richard Lenski has spent decades overseeing the most extensive, most acclaimed laboratory evolution experiment conducted to date.

Evolution IconEvolution
Evolution News
February 14, 2019, 3:05 PM

Listen: Dissent from Darwin List Tops 1,000 — Now the Scientists Weigh In

Robert Crowther explores why some scientists are willing to risk their research and careers to voice their skepticism of evolutionary theory.

Evolution IconEvolution
Michael Behe
February 14, 2019, 12:20 PM

Coyne and Polar Bears: Why You Should Never Rely on Incompetent Reviewers

A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes.

Evolution IconEvolution
Evolution News
February 14, 2019, 4:51 AM

Science Review Offers False Accusations about Chloroquine Resistance

In one paragraph Lents et al. twice cited sources they thought contradicted Behe, and twice suggested he ignored or dismissed contrary evidence.

Intelligent Design IconIntelligent Design
David Klinghoffer
February 13, 2019, 4:22 PM

Ben Shapiro Rethinks Life’s Origins — Applauds Meyer’s Signature in the Cell

Shapiro accepts the idea of evolution, but he also appreciates that intelligent design is ultimately a way of understanding evolution, the mechanism that drives it.

Posts navigation

Prev Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5 Page6 … Page1,895 Next

Trending

  • Train Wreck of a Review: A Response to Lenski et al. in Science
  • Conversation Evolves: Richard Lenski Responds to Michael Behe
  • Listen: Dissent from Darwin List Tops 1,000 — Now the Scientists Weigh In
  • In the Controversy over Intelligent Design, Seeking Genuine Dialogue
  • Coyne and Polar Bears: Why You Should Never Rely on Incompetent Reviewers

Recommended

  • The ID Underground and Other Reflections
  • Is Biology Approaching the Threshold of Design?
  • Genetics, Epigenetics: New Problems for Darwinism
  • Of Lunar Eclipses and the Dark Ages Myth
  • Michael Behe’s Marshall McLuhan Moment
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2019 Discovery Institute