Tag: Colleagues’ Responses
Meet the “Unknown Scientist”
I can’t help but compare this Unknown Scientist to the “Unknown Comic” from the 1980s. I picture “Smildon,” bag over his head, reciting his “scrupulously fair” review of Darwin’s Doubt.
In National Review, John Farrell’s Predictable and Misleading Review of Darwin’s Doubt
Instead of addressing, or even accurately representing, Meyer’s main argument for intelligent design, Farrell devotes a significant portion of his review to criticizing the book for the alleged misuse of an ellipsis.
On Darwin’s Doubt, Still Waiting to Hear from Big Shots in the Darwin Brigade
Listening to Stephen Meyer on the Michael Medved Show today, I was struck by something.
Complexity by Subtraction Was Weird Enough; Now, Complexity by Harmful Mutations
A new paper casts evolution as kind of a trampoline: organisms can bounce higher by jumping off the fitness peak.
Darwin Defenders Love Donald Prothero’s Ranting Review of Darwin’s Doubt
We thought it was important to repost this excellent response by Casey Luskin, which serves as a decisive rebuttal to Dr. Prothero’s claims.