Tag: graduate students
Deadline to Apply for Summer Seminars on Intelligent Design Is Today, April 3!
At most colleges and universities, perhaps including the one you yourself attend, research and teaching about intelligent design is forbidden science.
Summer Seminars on Intelligent Design — A Week in Seattle FREE — But You Must Apply by April 3
This is how we train the next generation of scientists and scholars in the leadership of the ID movement.
Summer Seminars on Intelligent Design, Deadline April 3 — The Education You Won’t Get in College
One of the consequences of academia’s embargo against ID is that students on their own university campuses can’t learn about evidence for design in nature.
Darwinists Continue Smear Campaign against Ohio Grad Student
Just in time for the anniversary of the Scopes trial, the folks over at Panda’s Thumb are continuing their unseemly crusade against Ohio State doctoral candidate Bryan Leonard. Even though these Darwinian fundamentalists don’t support academic freedom for teachers and scientists who are skeptical of Darwin, you’d think they might draw the line at going after students. Apparently, however, their bigotry and intolerance knows no bounds. Unhappy that Leonard’s dissertation committee has effectively refuted the misinformation spread by Panda’s Thumb and others, blogger Richard Hoppe has responded with even more smears. Here are replies to some of the new disinformation put out by Hoppe:
New Info about Ohio Grad Student Persecuted by Darwinists
Over the past month, Darwinists have been waging a vicious campaign of defamation against Ohio State University science education doctoral candidate Bryan Leonard. (For more information about Leonard’s situation, see here.) Mr. Leonard’s doctoral dissertation defense has been put in limbo after certain Darwinist professors alleged that his research was “unethical” because it involved teaching students about scientific criticisms of Darwin’s theory, an approach called for in Ohio’s official science standards! Darwinists have variously claimed that members of Leonard’s doctoral committee were improperly selected, that Leonard engaged in “unethical” research, or that he taught his students intelligent design. According to members of Leonard’s dissertation committee, however, all of these charges are false. Two members of the committee have just issued Read More ›