Tag: Nathan Lents
From Swamidass on Chloroquine Resistance, a Response that Doesn’t Respond
Swamidass’s response doesn’t address our main arguments, but he indicates he is impressed by what Darwinian mechanisms accomplished in generating chloroquine resistance.
On Chloroquine Resistance, Nathan Lents Severely Misrepresents Behe’s Arguments
If you’re going to engage with an individual you disagree with, it’s important to know what that person argues and to state it accurately.
Perplexing: Michael Behe’s Critics Falsely Claim He Ignores Exaptation
Writing in the journal Science, reviewers Lents, Swamidass, and Lenski make a very specific, clear, strong, and unambiguous claim.
Darwin Devolves Rides a Wave; One Week Left to Pre-order and Get the Perks!
I’m trying to think of a book that provoked as much discussion and debate — before it is even published.
Conversation Evolves: Richard Lenski Responds to Michael Behe
Yes, Nathan Lents, finally we agree: it is “A good day for thoughtful discussion of evolution.”