Tag: peer-review
Integrity in Science — A Facebook Dialogue
BIO-Complexity is not the first journal to be founded to advance a controversial case.
Peer-Reviewed Paper Successfully Measures Specified Complexity in Computer Images
“Is information being created when we snap a picture of Niagara Falls?”
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Paper Develops New Ways of Measuring Complex and Specified Information in Life
The “Game of Life” is a computer simulation that’s meant to mimic living systems.
#6 of Our Top Stories of 2015: Peer-Reviewed Paper Reveals Darwin’s Unavoidable Catch-22 Problem
Before evolving new features, organisms would be swamped by genetic junk.
Peer-Reviewed Article on Transposable Elements Cites “Irreducible Complexity” and Other “Teleologic” Factors
Plant geneticist Wolf-Ekkehard L�nnig argues that irreducibly complex structures may defy explanation by TEs or other Darwinian factors.
No ID Research? Let’s Help Out This Iowa State Student
Responding to students who attack intelligent design is tricky.
Research by Dembski and Marks Makes Inroads in Technical Literature
Intelligent design is making unmistakable progress in mainstream scientific thinking. Here’s an example from a new paper in the journal of Soft Computing.
Neo-Darwinism’s Catch-22: Before Evolving New Features, Organisms Would Be Swamped by Genetic Junk
A new peer-reviewed paper in the journal Complexity presents a computational model of evolution.
Another Successful Prediction of Intelligent Design: Cell Paper Reports Functions for Synonymous Codons
ID expects that we should find deeper and deeper layers of function in biology, which by the same token represents a big problem for Darwinian evolution.
In Light of New BIO-Complexity Paper, Maintaining Neo-Darwinism Means Rejecting Established Methods of Historical Science
The typical response from evolutionists is that perhaps ancient enzymes were different, and more readily mutable to acquire new functions.