Some reviews that try to make a book look bad are so ill-informed and malicious that they actually make a good book look better.
The core difficulty for some scientists who read Michael Behe’s book is also the key idea at its heart.
An attribute of a good sci-fi story is that it should open new vistas for the imagination while, at the same time, not requiring the reader to put up with the preposterous.
Michael Behe correctly interpreted a paper by Liu et al. and followed its methodology, whereas his critics, Lents and Hunt, did not.
Lenski agrees that the beneficial mutations seen in his Long Term Evolution Experiment are overwhelmingly degradative or loss-of-function ones.