There’s something very clarifying about seeing an argument laid out in crisp bullet points.
Philosophical questions like who we are and where we came from are surely worth considering. But nothing in these documents will bring students closer to being able to do so in an informed manner.
Think of a situation where you have to crack the code on a bank vault, with many dials in the code, say 150, each specifying 1 out of 10 digits.
The design inference is obvious but often implicit, because explicit acknowledgement of design in biology carries with it substantial career risk.
In effect, protein engineers are using the power of random change plus intelligent design to see what if anything will improve function.